On November 19th, 2017 we learned about

Analysis of potatoes’ genetic past identifies opportunities for better breeding in the future

Don’t take this the wrong way, but you’re simpler than a potato, at least on a genetic level. A study of the lowly spuds’ genetic history has found not only how complex the modern potato’s genome is, but that it may be overdue for some innovation. This interest in potato evolution isn’t because potatoes are slacking off in meeting their mutation quota, but that potatoes are humanity’s third most important crop worldwide. If nudging the right gene might yield healthier french fries, we might all be better for it.

A modern, cultivated potato has a lot of genetic material to look through, with over 39,000 genes in it’s genome. That’s more than a human’s 20,000 genes, and even more than potatoes own ancestors. Wild potatoes, as ancestors to the potatoes we grow to eat, are much simpler in comparison. They reproduce with what’s known as a diploid genome, with two sets of chromosomes per organism. This can be accomplished with seeds and berries, a feature that has obviously been bred out of their domesticated counterparts.

Taming the tuber

In the last eight- to ten-thousand years, human intervention changed a lot about these starchy members of the nightshade family. A domesticated potato can reproduce asexually, and now sports a tetroid genome, with four sets of chromosomes per individual. To potatoes out of the Andes mountains, we’ve altered everything from their pest resistance to the the plants’ circadian rhythm, as growing outside high mountain ranges meant differing amounts of sunlight per day. These sorts of mutations are among the 2,622 genes that transformed the potato into the staple starch we now find at the grocery store.

While researchers would like to see further change in the potato genome, they’re mostly looking to achieve it the old fashioned way. In the relatively short time since potatoes were first domesticated, farmers have been able to make some significant changes to these plants. With that said, there is concern that more recent breeding efforts have hit a bit of a ceiling, with no major improvements to speak of in the last 100 years. With more specific information about the potato genome, we may be able to make more significant gains via more carefully planned breeding programs. So as much as you may enjoy your mashed potatoes today, farmers may be able to offer an even better option in the not-so-distant future.

Source: Examining Potatoes’ Past Could Improve Spuds Of The Future by Layne Cameron and Robin Buell, MSU Today

On October 15th, 2017 we learned about

The plants that deter their demise by becoming more toxic and doubling their DNA

While people often become vegetarians or vegans to avoid causing harm to animals, there’s plenty of evidence that plants aren’t much happier about being eaten than any animal. Sure, fruit can be tasty and enticing so that a plant’s seeds will be distributed, but the leaves and stems themselves are more likely to be bitter or dangerously toxic for interested herbivores. If the plant itself is eaten, it will probably miss its chance to reproduce, a goal so significant that some plants actively respond to threats as they occur. This may mean trying to regrow lost leaves or stems that were chomped off. Or it could mean a plant will warn their kin to increase their production of nasty toxins to scare off incoming insects. Or, in plants known appropriately dubbed “overcompensators,” a single plant will adopt both strategies at once, fighting back the threat of being consumed so vigorously that they end up better off after being bitten than if they lived their whole lives untouched.

The ideal scenario for an overcompensating plant is to be nibbled on enough to trigger its defenses, without causing so much damage the plant can’t carry on. Once a primary stem is bitten or clipped, plants like the mustard Arabidopsis thaliana will increase their growth rate, regrowing the lost stem two to three times faster than it originally grew. To make sure the plant isn’t simply restocking some herbivore’s buffet, the plant will also increase the amount of toxins it produces so that it theoretically won’t get munched on again. This two-pronged strategy not only helps keep the plants alive, it may even give them a boost, as they have been found to enjoy greater reproductive success, spreading more seeds, than plants of the same species that never responded to danger.

Pumping out proteins

As from the energetic cost of tacking both toxins and regrowth at once, the weird part of these abilities is just how the plants make themselves grow faster. Normally growth involves a cell cloning its DNA then dividing into two so that each resulting cell is copy of the first, complete with cells walls, mitochondria, etc. Those cells can then do whatever job the original cell was doing before, like making proteins vital to the plant’s metabolism. These overcompensating plants speed up growth with a process called endoreduplication, which tries to get twice as much out existing cells, rather than having them split themselves in two. A cell’s DNA will be copied, but both copies stay put and go to work. This means that that first cell can kind of multitask, encoding two proteins simultaneously using both strands of DNA, but without the overhead of a second cell’s other organelles. As it happens, the molecular triggers for endoreduplication also help kick off toxin production, making overcompensating a rather elegant package for a plant to adopt.

Researchers are hoping that this package is also transferable to other plants. While 90 percent of herbaceous flowers currently engage in endoreduplication, there could be big benefits if commonly farmed crops used it more often. Responsive toxicity levels could reduce the amount of pesticides needed to protect plants like cotton. Higher growth rates would be appreciated in all kinds of crops, shortening the amount of time necessary to get a full year’s yield. There’s more work do be done, but farms may someday be able to significantly boost their crops’ growth with just a bit of well-intentioned pruning.

Source: Some plants grow bigger – and meaner – when clipped, study finds by Diana Yates, Illinois News Bureau

On September 20th, 2017 we learned about

Policing and preventing the burl poaching that puts redwood forests at risk

How much would you pay for a piece of a tree’s metabolic dysfunction? What if was the shape of a wall clock or coffee table? Even if you’re hesitating, there’s enough demand for what’s essentially deformed wood that national and state park rangers have begun working with police to deter poachers. The wood, known as burls, is valuable enough that so called “midnight burlers” are sneaking into parks under the cover of night, removing portions of trees and possibly putting the forest at risk.

Twisted tissue in tree tumors

You’ve probably seen a burl at some point, as they’re not uncommon on large trees. Thanks to an injury or just exposure to infected soil, a tree will become infected with bacteria like Agrobacterium tumefaciens or fungi like Exobasidium vaccinii. The pathogen will alter the plant’s DNA, causing the metabolism speed up growth in one part of the tree, essentially resulting in a large, woody tumor. As the growth gets bigger, it can bulge out from a tree trunk, sometimes ending up with a larger diameter than the tree itself. Trees can survive with one or multiple burls for many years, although there is evidence that they’re a bit of a drain on the tree’s health, as burl-carrying trees tend to die earlier than their burl-free kin.

While the trees don’t benefit from growing burls, woodworkers love them. When cut open, burls reveal a much more chaotic, randomized structure than healthy trunk. The wood grain in a burl is swirled and uneven, often containing multiple shades of color, and can be polished for rather spectacular effect. Importantly, it’s also just very different from healthy wood, and that rarity is what’s making it valuable enough for poachers to steal, even out of State and National parks.

Blocking the burlers

California’s redwood forests have been targeted by poachers for the last few years. Morning patrols would turn up massive trees with enormous holes chopped out of their trunks. With over a hundred thousand acres of forest to patrol, there’s been little hope of catching thieves red-handed, as the poachers can cut a burl and deliver it to a buyer in a single night. The wood buyers are somewhat complacent, but aside from weird delivery hours, there hasn’t been a clear way for them to obviously know when a burl has been illegally harvested.

That might be changing though, as rangers and law enforcement have been trying new tactics to slow down the poaching. Careful mapping of which trees were attacked revealed that poachers aren’t picking the best or most hidden burls, but simply targeting trees close to the road. This has allowed rangers to better plan their patrols, reducing the amount of territory they might need to guard each night. After a tree is poached, advances in DNA analysis may soon make it easy to identify which tree a particular burl came from. By making the wood traceable, wood buyers may need to become a little more thoughtful about where their supplies come from.

Fighting for the forest

While trees generally do better without burls, preventing poachers from cutting them off is good news, especially for redwoods. While the burls represent a metabolic disorder, they’re also packed with nutrients. Losing a dense ball of nutrients isn’t great for the adult tree, but it’s also bad for redwoods’ suckers. When the young trees try to start growing, a missing burl robs them of a considerable source of nutrients, hurting the forest’s natural rejuvenation. Additionally, since many poachers are working with chainsaws as quickly as possible in the middle of the night, the cuts to remove the burls are often rough and haphazard, raising the remaining tree’s risk of new infections.

It should be noted that not all burled wood is obtained illegally. Many woodworkers harvest burls from less vulnerable species of tree, and do so in a more responsible way. As demand, and prices, rise, more midnight burlers are likely to try to pass their goods off as legitimate. At this point, it’s in everyone’s interest to make sure the poached wood is kept out of the market, and our living rooms.

My kids said: Maybe if the poachers know that they’re hurting the redwood trees they’ll stop.

That would be fantastic. Unfortunately, poaching markets seem to be tied not just to demand from buyers, but also to downturns in other parts of the economy. Chances are, many poachers feel like they don’t have a lot of choices, and a few thousand dollars for some stolen wood seems like the easiest answer.

Source: How Forest Forensics Could Prevent the Theft of Ancient Trees by Lyndsie Bourgon, Smithsonian

On September 7th, 2017 we learned about

Electrifying plant matter for healthier leaves and better power storage

We’re not far off from plugging in our plants. The boundary between organic, leafy greens and metallic electronics is becoming increasingly blurred, although the end result won’t exactly look like a LED grass or an electrified salad (sadly). Still, there’s an impressive range in where plants and electronics are overlapping, starting with some well-roasted leaves that are may soon be recycled into capacitors.

Using leaves to manipulate a current

Appropriate to their names, Chinese phoenix trees are being reborn in fire as highly conductive carbon microspheres. Thankfully, the whole tree doesn’t need to be destroyed in this process, as the carbon is obtained from dead leaves that pile up in autumn. That convenience aside, you probably aren’t going to start getting capacitors out of your yard waste any time soon, as these leaves are dried, powered, heated for 12 hours at 428° Fahrenheit, mixed with potassium hydroxide, then heated again in rapidly changing temperatures up to 1,472°.

It’s a lot of work, but the payoff is a renewable source of highly porous carbon spheres that may pave the way for a variety of plant-based electronic components. The pores create a very high surface area for the tiny pellets, which may even qualify as supercapacitors transferring three times more power than graphene supercapacitors. The phoenix tree leaves work especially well, but researchers are already looking into other plants like potato skins, corn straw, pine wood and rice straw as other sources of conductive carbon.

Measuring the current in leaves

On the flip-side, if you’re looking to produce more foliage instead of electricity, there’s still a reason to wire up a plant’s leaves. Lightweight electrical sensors are being clipped onto leafy crops to measure how well they conduct electricity in differing soil conditions. Once baselines are established, these tiny variances may help measure exactly when a plant is dried out enough to need a drink, reducing a farm’s water usage.

To make these measurements, a small sensor was clipped to leave on different plants for 11 days. As the plants absorbed more or less water, their leaves would swell or shrink at the same time. That tiny change in thickness would then alter the flow of electricity through the leaf enough to be detected, and could then inform a farmer, or automated irrigation system, when plants were really ready for more water, even if the normal watering schedule didn’t sync up. These measurements were compared against a separate sensor in the soil to verify that they were on the right track. The measurements are complicated by the fact that photosynthesis can also change the flow of electricity through a leaf, but researchers are still confident this system will allow farms to be much more sensitive to their stressed plants.

Source: High-Tech Electronics Made From Autumn Leaves, Scienmag

On August 21st, 2017 we learned about

Thin, smooth bark makes Madrone tree trunks seem cool to the touch

I may need to start petting trees more often. I’ve long known of trees that had particular colors and smells in their leaves and trunks, but I only learned in the last week that some trees hold surprises for your finger tips to discover. The tree in question was a Pacific Madrone (Arbutus menziesii), and was actually hard to miss thanks to its striking red bark peeling off the trunk. The surprise was that the tree was cool to the touch, which is why it’s sometimes called the “refrigerator tree.”

For something cool to the touch, Madrone trees need lots of sunshine to thrive. If conditions are right, they can grow to be nearly 100 feet tall, but at smaller sizes Madrone trees can be mistaken for some of their red-barked relatives, like the Manzanita (Arctostaphylos). Both plants’ eye catching bark grows thin and smooth, but this trait is especially striking in mid-summer when Madrone tree bark starts to peel off the trunk. At that point, a quick touch makes it hard to ignore how much cooler these trees are than the surrounding environment.

Cold or just conductive?

Except that they’re not really cooler. The trees’ temperature is likely the same as any of the other similarly-sized plants that grow near them, just like a paper book is the same temperature as a metal keys sitting in the same room. With sufficient time, the temperatures equalize, but when we touch the metal, or the Madrone trunk, it feels colder. This is because heat is more easily transferred to certain materials than others, and when heat from our hand is conducted away we perceive it as colder. Now, a Madrone tree obviously isn’t metal, but that thin, smooth bark isn’t as good an insulator as the rough, corky bark that you find on most trees. Your hand is able to come into more contact with the smooth surface, and the sap and fluids flowing inside the trunk can then wick your body heat away.

Even if refrigerator trees aren’t actually colder, their unusual bark obviously still stands out from that of their neighbors in the forest. The thin, peeling bark that exposes the trunk may have originally evolved as a form of defense. By shedding the outer layer of bark, the tree can dump any fungi, mosses, lichens or other parasites that tried taking up residence on the red wood. The red itself is likely another form of defense, as the tannins that make up that coloration would be bitter and possibly toxic to animals that might want to munch on the tree, not unlike the colorful bark found on rainbow eucalyptus. It’s good that the peeling is helpful to these plants, because now that they know about these chilled trees, it’s going to be hard to keep my kids’ hands off them.

Source: The Refrigerator Tree by Steve, Nature Outside

On August 20th, 2017 we learned about

Digital farming tools simulate a full season’s growth in a single day

Humans have been manipulating the evolution of plants for ages, but usually at a pace slow enough we barely notice. By planting seeds from specific plants that had attributes we liked more than others, say a more pleasing color, or larger amount of tasty flesh, we’ve transformed many plants into the produce we know today. However, this is a slow process, and farmers are looking for ways to speed things up while reducing the costs associated with experimenting with a whole season’s crops. The solution may be to first grow crops on a in silico, or “in silicon chips,” before ever putting a seed in the ground.

The simulations that are being developed allow for some very specific details to be tested. For instance, will you get a bigger crop yield if you plant your sugarcane in staggered rows, or all lined up? Should they be angled north-south, or east-west? A farmer could plant four different fields of sugarcane to see which did best, although in doing so they might introduce new variables to the mix. It would also be a slow process, possibly risking income for 12 months of work.

The in silico version took all the available data and came up with a prediction in 24 hours. It considered minutiae down to the amount of light that might be blocked by a neighboring plant’s leaves at different times of the day, then produced a 3D visualization to show the expected outcome of each field arrangement.  In this case, staggered plants planted on a north-south axis was predicted to increase yields by ten percent, making that a much safer test to run in the real world for confirmation.

Farming experiments made even faster

As these tools are developed, researchers hope that the speed and depth of the simulations can be improved. Not everyone can tie up a supercomputer for 24 hours to test out a new technique, and the goal is to eventually simulate a whole season’s growth in a minute, making it easier to try out different variables. The number of variables should also be increased to incorporate more data that different labs have been creating over the past decades, but that requires some serious coordination efforts. Not every research team uses the same tools or data structure to archive their experimental findings, which makes integrating existing information about crops difficult.

Still, the developers are confident that all these challenges can be met, partially because they have to. Concerns over population, soil quality and fresh-water availability suggest that farms will need to be more efficient than ever in the coming years. A tool that lets you configure and simulate new ideas in a single afternoon could save everyone a lot of time and resources.

Source: Growing Virtual Plants Could Help Farmers Boost Their Crops by Leslie Nemo, Scientific American

On August 8th, 2017 we learned about

Cocoa plants get protection from their healthy neighbors’ leftover leaves

The next time you’re about to enjoy a bite of chocolate, take a moment to thank the fungi and other microbiota that made it possible. Like the microbes humans start picking up at birth, organisms like Colletotrichum tropicale come to live on cocoa plants, helping them be more resilient to pathogens that would otherwise destroy the plant. Fortunately for farmers, and chocolate lovers, experiments suggest that this kind of fungal protection isn’t hard to spread between cocoa plants— sharing a bit of leaf litter from healthy neighbors should do the trick.

One of the biggest concerns for a cocoa, papaya and other tropical plants is Phytopthora palmivora, the “plant destroyer.” Once infected, a plant will start rotting at a variety of locations, from the roots to the fruit, and thus is a huge problem for farmers. The pathogen can be found in soil and water throughout tropical ecosystems, but fortunately protective fungi like C. tropicale aren’t too hard to come by either. Just as microbes can be shared between people when they touch, contact with leaf litter from healthy plants seems to be a good way to spread preferred microbes.

Testing leaf-based transmission

Researchers tested the effectiveness of leaf litter with cocoa plants initially grown from sterile seeds in sterilized chambers. Their leaves were verified as being fungus free before one-third of the plants had dead leaves from healthy cocoa plants placed in their pots. Other plants got mixed leaves from the forest, and some had none at all. They were all given a little time to grow outdoors in more “natural” conditions before purposely being exposed to P. palmivora. After three weeks, the plants with healthy cocoa leaves on their soil fared the best. DNA sequencing also confirmed that these plants leaves had a considerable population of the helpful fungus, C. tropicale.

While growing up in the leave litter of a healthy plant seems beneficial, there are limits to proximity. If a parent plant is infected, it can just as easily spread pathogens to its offspring. So cocoa farmers need to keep an eye on their plants to make sure the healthier plants are the ones dumping their leaves their neighbors.

Source: Litter Bugs May Protect Chocolate Supply, Scienmag

On August 7th, 2017 we learned about

Light pollution is driving nocturnal pollinators away from their favorite plants

Plants need light to grow, but many need a good dose of darkness as well. This is because some very effective pollinators wait until dark to visit plants’ flowers, meaning that a plant can work on reproduction night and day, growing more seeds for new plants. This has served plants well for millions of years, and a variety of very effective pollinators only come out at night, from moths to beetles to bats. Unfortunately, recent experiments in Switzerland indicate that humanity’s love of lighting may be casting a shadow over this otherwise efficient system.

The basic model to be tested was that artificial lighting is scaring nocturnal pollinators away from their favorite flowers. Setting up this experiment was tricky though, as artificial lighting in developed areas has left very few places in total darkness at night. This forced researchers from the University of Bern to head for the foot of the Alps to find some cabbage thistles (Cirsium oleraceum) that still enjoyed a decent amount of darkness each night, at which point they started shining lights on them. Half the thistle plants were left in natural conditions and monitored with night-vision goggles, while the others were illuminated by semi-portable LED lamps meant to imitate a streetlight, albeit one with a very long extension cord.

Staying out of the spotlight

Pollinators were counted and collected each night, and the various nocturnal critters clearly showed a preference for the dark. There were 62 percent fewer visits by pollinators, and 29 percent less variety among the pollinators that did risk exposure in the lights. Even though daytime pollinators visited both sets of thistles equally, the plants that missed their nighttime visitors showed a significant decrease in the number of seeds they produced. The decrease in seeds actually outweighed the decline in pollinator visits, suggesting that nighttime pollinators may do a better job of moving pollen on a per-visit basis. In other words, adding more bees and butterflies during the day wouldn’t easily replace the lack of moths and beetles at night.

One hope is that the plants still left in darkness are getting extra pollinator traffic from all the visitors that are scared off by human-made lighting. However, the pockets of darkness left in some areas are so isolated in many places that these more successful plants probably won’t make up for the losses experienced by their well-lit counterparts. This isn’t the only concern that’s been raised about artificial lighting, indicating that we may have to reconsider how badly we really need all our outdoor night-lights.

Source: Artificial Light Deters Nocturnal Pollinators, Study Suggests by Scott Neuman, The Two-Way

On July 12th, 2017 we learned about

Tomatoes infuse their leaves with toxins to turn insects against each other

Tomato plants do not want to be eaten. The 31 pounds of tomatoes each American gobbles per year is fine, because that helps with seed dispersal and gives us a reason to plant more tomatoes. The problem for the plants is that too many bugs bypass the red fruit and eat the leaves of the plant, leaving it with no way to produce its own food through photosynthesis. To defend themselves, the plants have found a way to control the bugs’ appetites and populations— they get the bugs to eat each other.

This pest-control concept is actually based on normal behavior in various pest herbivorous insects, like mottled willow moth caterpillars (Spodoptera exigua). When these bugs can’t get enough nutritious food, they don’t really have the means to travel to find something better, as they’re trying their best to hoard calories in preparation for metamorphosis. So when the leaves are scarce, or just low enough quality, the insects will start eating each other instead as the last local source of nutrients and calories.

Turning up the toxins

Tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) have evolved to exploit this quirk of pest ecology. Tomatoes in danger can start producing extra toxins in their leaves that make them less nutritious to eat. Manipulating leaf-quality like this then convinces caterpillars it’s time to switch to cannibalism. In experiments, caterpillars offered more toxic leaves started munching caterpillar corpses much sooner than their peers. From the tomato plant’s perspective, adjusting the chemistry of leaves may be energetically costly, so they don’t make their leaves less attractive all the time. When circumstances demand it, this strategy does work well enough to make a measurable difference in just how much each plant gets eaten.

The last layer of this defensive strategy is that a tomato plant doesn’t need to get bitten to start raise its defenses. Like a variety of other plants, tomato plants can warn each other about the arrival of herbivores. They emit a compound called methyl jasmonate (MeJA) that can be detected by nearby plants, giving them a chance to start toxifying their leaves before the insects begin their buffet. There is some interest in manipulating this warning system, since presumably farmers could release MeJA to warn crops whenever they wanted. However, it might be best to follow the tomato plants’ lead on this, since constant warnings and toxic leaves could stress the plants while selecting for only the hardiest, toughest insects around.

Source: Plants turn caterpillars into cannibals by Laura Castells, Nature

On July 10th, 2017 we learned about

Plants and fungi that spray, splatter and sling their seeds and spores

If the apple doesn’t fall too far from the tree, they both have a problem. The seeds in the apple may take root next to its parent where it will be forced to compete for nutrients and sunlight, possibly stunting its growth and wasting the investment the parent plant made in the seeds. Fortunately for apples, the seeds are packaged in yummy, sugar-filled fruit that animals eat, taking the seeds for a ride along the way. As those seeds are pooped or discarded elsewhere, the seeds have a chance to grow in new territory away from their parents. Not all plants make such attractive fruit though, and so many have had to find other ways to give their offspring a push to newer pastures. In some cases, that even means evolving mechanisms to squirt, eject or catapult seeds and spores to ensure a bit of distance between each generation.

Shooting spores

Starting small, many fungi have ways to launch their spores into the air when it’s time to reproduce. The Pilobolus mold, for instance, uses sap to build up pressure in a stalk called the sporangiophore. Once the pressure is too great to contain, the end of the sporangiophore bursts open, launching a payload of pinhead-sized spore capsules. Those tiny capsules are ejected at up to 55 miles per hour, sometimes traveling as far as six feet. For molds that grow less than half an inch high, that’s plenty of distance to ensure the spores end up on the grass they need to continue their life-cycle.

Slinging sori

On a larger scale, some plants throw their spores rather than fire them out of a fluid-powered cannon. The delicate ferns you find in shady forests have a two-stage life-cycle, and to get spores in a safe location to grow into gametophytes, the spores need to move away from the parent plant. To do this, clumps of spore pellets, called sori, grow on the underside of the fern’s leaves. Once the sori dry out, the a catapult mechanism flings them into the air where they can be carried on the wind, animal fur, or in local waterways.

Ferns don’t exactly look like catapults, but they can launch their spore in a process that takes less than a half-second to complete. A coiled group of cells called an annulus grows around spore capsules, bent in an arch to build a bit of mechanical tension. Once dried sufficiently, the annulus snaps forward to lob the spore capsule. To keep it from bending too far and flinging the spore back at the leaf, a tiny amount of water squeezes through pores in the annulus, blocking that forward movement and releasing the spore at an optimal trajectory. This tiny delivery structure can send spores flying at around 22 miles per hour once released.

Popping pods

Launching spores are one thing, but firing full-sized seeds into the air requires some heavier artillery. Various plants grow seed containers that dry out unevenly, squeezing the seeds from one side. For example, when gorse seed pods are sufficiently dried out, they fire seeds out at around 18 miles per hour. Gorse seeds usually only travel a few feet, but pinching seeds for propulsion is used by the Bauhinia tree to send seeds as far as 49 feet.

Self-firing fruit

The biggest payload to be propelled off a plant may be Ecballium elaterium, better known as the Squirting cucumber. Like the cucumber you put on your salad, this plant’s seeds grow in a protective, oblong fruit, although there’s a lot less flesh to actually eat. Instead the two-inch fruit fills mostly with fluid, with enough room for a 20 or so seeds to go flying away from the parent plant.

When filled with fluid, there’s enough pressure in a single cucumber to give it a bit of a hair trigger, ready for wind or a passing animal to kick things off. When “activated,” the cucumber will detach from the stalk it grows on, ejecting water and seeds into the air out of newly formed opening where the stem attached. Like a rocket booster, the cucumber shell will be pushed towards the ground while the seeds will fly as far as 20 feet away. It seems like this should make for the most exciting, kid-pleasing vegetable ever, but aside from being mostly water, Squirting cucumbers contain a lot of cucurbitacins, pest-deterring chemicals which are toxic if ingested. It seems that Squirting cucumbers are better to watch than to eat.

Source: An explosive start for plants: Plants get up to some ingenious tricks and aerial acrobatics to ensure their survival by Paul Simons, New Scientist